Jun 17 2009

Posted by jlcrow

The Decline of the Gate Keepers: Idiots Rule

I have been on the internet a long time compared to many others. I purchased my first domain in 1995. Before that I ran multiple Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) and was on FidoNet for the distribution of messages between BBSs. One thing that I have realized a long time ago is that, in general, people as a whole are stupid. Any one person may be smart, but groups of them are not. Recently Trent Reznor has come to the same conclusion: Idiots Rule. My most recent foray from a few years ago, when Thelema.nu was a discussion forum, reminded me that people are not raised but lowered when groups are involved. AC was right on target when he noted the dangers of group work. Over these twenty-plus years I have learned that while the technology changes, often radically, certain fundamentals of interaction do not. As time proceeds I am convinced, repeatedly, that these fundamentals are more important than the changes in technology, and if they are adhered to, the experience is superior.

Continue Reading »

Tags: Blogs, History, Modernity, Personal, Technical

1 Comment »

May 09 2009

Posted by jlcrow

The Building Material for the Astral

I found out a few weeks ago that the Centre Pompidou has a large Kandinsky exhibit. The head librarian at the Amsterdam Theosophical Library was going to Paris last week and asked if I knew of any interesting things going on there. I immediately told him about the Kandinsky exhibit and briefly outlined how Kandinsky was influenced by Theosophy. I asked him to bring me the catalog of the exhibit if he was going. Much to my pleasure, he did go and was kind enough to buy the large and heavy book. He lugged it around Paris for the day just to bring it back for me. He has my greatest appreciation for sacrifice made on my part. I picked up the book yesterday and it is fantastic.

Fragment 2 for Composition VII , 1913; Oil on canvas, 87.5 x 99.5 cm (34 1/2 x 39 1/4 in); Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, NY

Kandinsky, Fragment 2 for Composition VII , 1913; Oil on canvas, 87.5 x 99.5 cm (34 1/2 x 39 1/4 in); Albright-Knox Art Gallery, Buffalo, NY

Kandinsky is considered one of the founders of abstract art. For this he is both praised and cursed. For many, abstract or non-representational art is hard to approach. At least with figurative art, there is something in it we can recognize, evaluate, and compare to the conventional world. Abstract art takes us away from what we know, from that with which we are comfortable. How is one supposed to evaluate abstract art? Just for the colors? Forms? Brush strokes? Materials? This makes looking at the art difficult. People say they just don’t “get it.” This is one of the many reasons that abstract and non-representational art as become the domain of specialists and modern art enthusiasts and is less appreciated by the “average man on the street.”. I must admit, at one point I was in this camp. I did not know what to do with abstract art. How long do I look at it? Do I focus on all of it, or just a part? How am I supposed to feel about it? Does the art make any sense?

A few years ago I was talking to a friend about how we would create the world if we were gods? If you were the Almighty, what aesthetic would you use to design the world? In the course of the conversation I mentioned Romare Bearden and how I really liked his large scale collages. For me, putting the two together created a world in which living collages interacted and size and proportion were divergent from what we are used to today. Without knowing it, though, in that conversation the seed was laid for my appreciation of abstract art.

Continue Reading »

Tags: Amsterdam, Art, Books, Magick, Modernity, Personal, Theosophy

6 Comments »

May 05 2009

Posted by jlcrow

Review: Italian & Norwegian Liber AL vel Legis

This book shall be translated into all tongues: but always with the original in the writing of the Beast; for in the chance shape of the letters and their position to one another: in these are mysteries that no Beast shall divine.
Liber AL vel Legis, Chapter III, verse 47.

Early in my time with the Ordo Templi Orientis, I volunteered to be the technical director of the O.T.O.’s translator’s guild. One of the first projects I began working on was compiling the various translations of Liber AL for a “polyglot edition.” In those days, there were about fifteen languages available but the coordination between the various international bodies was less than desired. Nevertheless, the idea was to create an edition of Liber AL with all the translations in one place. Not long after I started compiling the versions, the idea was shelved in favor of each country creating its own version.

Over the years since I have been collecting the various versions of Liber AL. Recently I received the two additions to my collection: the Italian and Norwegian versions; each published by the O.T.O. of their respective country. Below is a review of each books presentation of the text. Note that I am not able to review the actual translations of each. I understand this is a bit of a failing, but nothing I can help at this point—I don’t speak or read Italian or Norwegian. Nevertheless, how the Law is presented is important and being that I have been involved with the production of a number of editions of Liber AL, I think it is acceptable to look just at the material presentation.

Continue Reading »

Tags: Books, Crowley, O.T.O., Personal, Technical, Thelema, Thelemic Community

7 Comments »

May 01 2009

Posted by jlcrow

A Leopard and His Spots

Recently someone I know made a public apology for some incorrect information this person put on their blog. I think it is admirable for this person to accept responsibility for writing false information and attempting to remedy the situation. However, the sad part of the story is that this whole situation could have been avoided if the person had critically looked at the source.

One of the strange things I have observed over the years in the Thelemic community is a desire to not think critically about the people in it and not judge their behavior. For instance, Ron sees Jack treat Peter badly. Ron has seen Jack treat other people badly too. Yet if Peter confronted Ron about Jack’s behavior, Ron replies, “Well Jack has never treated me badly.” Thus Jack is allowed to continue to treat people badly and Ron does not hold Jack accountable because he has never “harmed” him personally. Even more perplexing is that when Jack does treat Ron badly, Ron is surprised! As if he could not have seen it coming.

What Ron demonstrates in a situation like this is a distinct lack of critical thinking. What made Ron think he was different and that Jack would not turn on him eventually? If a person is inherently a dishonest person, they will be dishonest to everyone. If someone is essentially abusive, they will be abusive to everyone. Yet the Ron’s of the Thelemic community continue think they are special and will not be treated badly or be told false things. Why is this? Continue Reading »

Tags: Blogs, Discipline, Kings/Slaves, Leadership, Morals/Values/Ethics, O.T.O., Personal, Thelema, Thelemic Community

3 Comments »

Apr 12 2009

Posted by jlcrow

A Bevy of YouTube Goodness

David Griffin, head of one of the modern Golden Dawn organizations, has recently posted a number of videos which include rituals of the GD and lectures by various members of the GD on YouTube. They can be seen here.

Also, a former member of the O.T.O. has posted a variety of videos recorded during the 1990s relating to a number of Thelemic topics including the Gnostic Mass, O.T.O. initiations and more. These can be seen here. I encourage everyone to watch the 1995 videos explaining an interpretation of the Mass by the author of Red Flame #2: Mystery of Mystery: A Primer of Thelemic Ecclesiastical Gnosticism.

Tags: History, Magick, Modernity, O.T.O., Technical, Thelema, Thelemic Community

Comments Off

Next »